I was happy to see on the news RFK Jr's suggestion/mandate, through the Dept of Health and Human Services, that SNAP benefits include restrictions, but it's not an original idea. That's the way things once were; and others, including me, have had the same suggestion; but they need to examine SNAP rules for more reasons than the junk food. In a published article I explained how I lost 30 pounds during COVID because I was able to buy good-quality food; and here's an exerpt from a 2021 post:
"Prior to Covid-19, my monthly food allotment was approximately $80, but has since increased by $100. This equals the maximum amount I might receive for my situation: 65, living alone, Social Security my sole income. It’s not hard to understand how my focus had been price over nutrition, so predictably, the pounds piled on.
"That began to change when I could afford better quality food, including fresh fruits and vegetables, leaner meats, healthful snacks and reduced calorie items. I replaced pasta with fish and read nutritional labels as never before. No longer huffing and puffing on short walks, I have more energy and don’t crave sweets as much; but just in case, I’ve discovered delicious, sugar-free chocolates. Encouraged by the bathroom scale, I continue eating smaller meals and curbing bad habits. I happily donated my wardrobe to fire victims.
"I therefore advocate at least a portion of the increased SNAP benefits become permanent, but with an unpopular yet sensible caveat: there should be restrictions on junk food. This idea is not new but was raised during deliberation of the Food Stamp Act of 1977, when a proposed change restricting low-nutritional foods was rejected. Here are a few examples of why the entire program could use re-examination:
"In grocery stores, only cold foods can be purchased using SNAP; nothing from the hot, prepared section. A freshly roasted chicken does not qualify; however, once that same unsold, dried-out carcass is placed in the refrigerated section it becomes eligible. Not everyone has an oven, consider fire and homeless victims.
"Not permitted are alcohol and tobacco, rightly so; but neither can SNAP be used for paper or hygiene products. Some people advocate dogfood be allowed but as a pet owner I disagree. Free dogfood is frequently donated through shelters, but hand soap and toothpaste don’t grow on trees.
"I can grab all the candy, ice cream, pastries, chips and soda I want. I could blow my entire month’s allotment running the gauntlet at the checkout stand. Holiday gift boxes with gourmet food items get through, I discovered by accident. I can even buy a jalapeno pepper plant.
"I need toilet paper more than a jumbo bag of M&M’s, and a warm meal is healthier than a can of Red Bull. If I crave a bag of chips but have to pay for it with cash, I’ll think twice and grab an apple. Imagine the reduced cases of obesity and diabetes alone.
"It won’t help to throw extra credit into SNAP accounts if people don’t know how to manage a limited budget, so I suggest every SNAP household receive a guide to shopping and cooking a healthful diet, such as Good and Cheap, Eat Well on $4 a Day, by Leanne Brown, (once) available online for free."
I was always astonished that I could wander the holiday isle and select a pretty box of chocolates; mugs with packets of sugary apple cider; or a brownie mix with a little pan included...and pay for it through SNAP. I used to be nervous at the register whether or not my card would cover the Russell Stover solid chocolate Bunny in my basket; and continue to be amazed when it hops through the checkout and into my bag, thanks Uncle Sam. Yes, I feel guilty, but I'll do almost anything for chocolate.
I'll bet Bobby II never had to worry about the not having enough to eat or the price of eggs. I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm not buying huevos imported from Venezuela or wherever; since we won't have a reliable FDA to assure they're safe. Chicks, farmers say, will be ready to lay eggs in about 6 months. I can make due until then. Can Gen Z?